anyway.



thread: 2006-01-26 : A Public Service Announcement

On 2007-12-13, Callan S. wrote:

Doesn’t this miss the mark kinda, in terms of game design? Typically you get people playing some game which is totally unsupportive of their idea of fun, but they just keep going back to with some associative link between that game and fun.

I thought judging fun was to look at that link and say ‘You know, that link might be completely bogus’.

I mean, sometimes people mix up their means of getting fun with what they actually find fun. Are we judging what they actually find fun, or the means they use (and often call those means ‘fun’ by mistake, imo).



 

This makes...
initials
...go...
short response
optional explanation (be brief!):

if you're human, not a spambot, type "human":