thread: 2006-01-26 : A Public Service Announcement

On 2006-01-26, Chris Goodwin wrote:

Ummm, yeah.

You can defend objective standards of quality, but fun?

If you’re saying “That thing that you think is fun?  It’s actually pretty lame,” then you’re judging the quality of the product, right?  Not the quality of the fun?  And you’re expecting anyone defending it to defend the quality of the product?


This makes CG go "Cross posted!"

This makes VB go "so my answer's 'precisely.'"
As you now see!

This makes...
short response
optional explanation (be brief!):

if you're human, not a spambot, type "human":