anyway.



thread: 2006-01-26 : A Public Service Announcement

On 2006-01-26, Vincent wrote:

I DO NOT want people to argue that non-thematic or non-participatory play has objective quality; for purposes of discussion on this blog, they don’t. (Obviously they do in the real world - that’s fine, we can discuss that in the real world).

I DO want people to argue that (for instance) play according to a traditional distribution of power can be as (or more) participatory as play according to Dogs’ distribution of power, if that’s what they believe. I DO want people to argue that (for instance) immersive play can be as (or more) thematic as non-immersive play, if that’s what they believe.

Have I answered your question, John? I have this feeling I may not have.



 

This makes...
initials
...go...
short response
optional explanation (be brief!):

if you're human, not a spambot, type "human":