anyway.



thread: 2006-01-26 : A Public Service Announcement

On 2006-01-26, Joshua Kronengold wrote:

Wait.  Vincent, are you saying that -no- criticsm is ok that doesn’t use participation and theme as its only criteria.

Or that doesn’t accept participation and theme as its highest criteria?

Or are you just saying “This is a Narrativist blog.  Don’t preach Simulationism or Gamism here.”

It seems to me that “That’s a way to get more particpation and theme, but despite my RPG goals being particpation and theme, I wouldn’t find it fun because..” is a reasonable statement, and sometimes a necessary one, or even an interesting one if that following “because” is interesting.



 

This makes...
initials
...go...
short response
optional explanation (be brief!):

if you're human, not a spambot, type "human":